Technology is not just the positive but also the negative advancement in all areas of society, because the misuse of its purpose, the waste of the potential of human intelligence, the lack of social skills and creativity skills that it creates.
State what technology is specifically. One could argue that technology promotes creativity because of the motion pictures we see in movies, etc. People could argue that social skills will actually blossom because there will always be that new and exciting advancement in technology people will want to discuss.
You might want to simplify your simple definition because advancement is broad. What type of advancement? Positive and negative are subjective and might require further explanation as well.
I think you should be more clear on what areas of society we use technology, not everyone has access to technology so it can't be used in ALL of society.
The term "positive or negative advancement" is itself something that needs to be defined. What is an advancement? Also, all areas of whose society? The entire world? American society?
This definition doesn't seem simply. It's not one sentence listing exactly what technology is and its qualifiers. Perhaps you could list what "Negative technology" is? Or revise your statement.
whew, this is like a run on sentence. I can't distinguish the qualifiers or simple definition. This can be arguable but you would need to simple it down the definition and make the qualifiers more apparent.
This is a little complicated. You may want to revise it so you have a clear and concise simple definition. This is arguable because people may argue that it refers to electronic devices specifically not society as a whole.
There is no simple definition here, but your qualifiers are great! I would say you have a very arguable definition in the works. Maybe you could cut down some wordage here.
I guess I am confused on where the simple definition is? Misuse of its purpose is good because its arguable.
ReplyDeleteState what technology is specifically. One could argue that technology promotes creativity because of the motion pictures we see in movies, etc. People could argue that social skills will actually blossom because there will always be that new and exciting advancement in technology people will want to discuss.
ReplyDeleteYou might want to simplify your simple definition because advancement is broad. What type of advancement? Positive and negative are subjective and might require further explanation as well.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean by advancement? Also, if you talk about the negative you have to talk about the positive as well.
ReplyDeleteSome could argue that technology is using human intelligence. You need intelligence to make the technology.
ReplyDeleteI think you should be more clear on what areas of society we use technology, not everyone has access to technology so it can't be used in ALL of society.
ReplyDeleteI believe he wanted the thesis in one simple sentence and you have two here, I would just get a bit more clear within your simple definition!
ReplyDeleteMake your definition simpler, because it seems to long and complex to be considered a simple definition, it does seem like it can be argued though.
ReplyDeleteThe term "positive or negative advancement" is itself something that needs to be defined. What is an advancement? Also, all areas of whose society? The entire world? American society?
ReplyDeleteThis definition doesn't seem simply. It's not one sentence listing exactly what technology is and its qualifiers. Perhaps you could list what "Negative technology" is? Or revise your statement.
ReplyDeletewhew, this is like a run on sentence. I can't distinguish the qualifiers or simple definition. This can be arguable but you would need to simple it down the definition and make the qualifiers more apparent.
ReplyDeleteThis is a little complicated. You may want to revise it so you have a clear and concise simple definition. This is arguable because people may argue that it refers to electronic devices specifically not society as a whole.
ReplyDeleteThere is no simple definition here, but your qualifiers are great! I would say you have a very arguable definition in the works. Maybe you could cut down some wordage here.
ReplyDeleteGood job with the qualifiers. I now know what i am going to be reading about in your paper. Well done.
ReplyDelete